Bias toward shipping controls, not slideware.
Compliance projects fail the same way every time: a six-month policy-writing phase, a panicked pentest at the end, and an audit that surfaces what should have been fixed in week three. We invert it.
Four phases. No mystery. No 80-page proposal.
The trigger is almost always the same: a prospect asked for SOC 2, or ISO, or a security questionnaire is sitting in someone’s inbox. We work backwards from the deal, not forwards from a template.
- 01
Scope to the actual deal
Two weeks. We read the procurement questionnaire your prospect sent, map what your stack actually does, and tell you the minimum scope that gets the contract signed. You leave with a roadmap and a fixed number, not a 90-page report.
- 02
Implement inside your repos
Controls land as Terraform, GitHub Actions, Okta groups, and short markdown policies that live in your monorepo. Your engineers keep shipping product; sprint velocity barely moves.
- 03
Pentest before the auditor
We break into your environment in week six, not week sixteen. The SQL injection in the new admin endpoint gets fixed before it becomes a finding that puts the cert on hold. Re-tests included.
- 04
Certify and keep the pipeline open
We sit in the audit calls with you. Once the certificate lands and enterprise deals start moving, we stay on for the security questionnaire flood, the surveillance audit twelve months later, and the next framework your buyers ask about.
Auditors respect us. Your engineers don’t resent us.
The two audiences who decide whether a compliance program succeeds. The compliance industry is built for one and at odds with the other. We are built for both.
-
Pentest-led, not policy-led
Most compliance firms write policies and outsource the pentest to a vendor you will never meet. We are the pentest team. Every control we recommend is one we have watched fail in someone else’s environment first.
-
Lives in your repos
Evidence as YAML, signed and version-controlled. Controls as Terraform modules and GitHub Actions. Policies as markdown next to your code. Your senior engineers stop calling compliance theatre.
-
Your auditor’s checklist, not ours
Before kickoff we get on a call with your auditor and map their specific interpretation of every control to your stack. No surprise findings six weeks in, no rewrite cycles because their definition of "least privilege" differs from ours.
-
The same Slack channel for years
The person who writes your Statement of Applicability is the person on your surveillance-audit call two years later, and the renewal call after that. No account managers. No offshore handoff. No re-onboarding tax when ISO 27017 comes up next.
Stop scheduling compliance around the audit.
Get a 30-minute scoping call. Walk out with a real timeline, a real number, and a no-pressure answer to “is this even worth it for us right now.”